OK, back to level crossing removals. My local ones are going full bore, and I thought I’d post an update and provide a Q+A opportunity.
The project summary
- Originally removal of just the Ormond level crossing was funded by the Coalition. The project was expanded to include adjacent crossings at Mckinnon and Bentleigh after Labor came to power in November 2014 with a pledge to start removal of 20 crossings by 2018.
- Project works commenced in 2015, and an accelerated schedule will see it wrapping up by the end of 2016.
- Each will be rail under road, with all three stations rebuilt.
- All stations will sit under the roads. Ormond will get entrances on both sides of North Road. Mckinnon and Bentleigh stations will only have entrances on the northern side. All three to have pedestrian crossings right outside. In most cases bus stops will be moved to be outside the stations.
- Unfortunately no additional pedestrian crossing points or access or is currently planned.
- Bentleigh (Premium) will have fare gates. Ormond will have provision for future Premium status, including provision for gates.
My long post last year has a lot more on this (though some details have changed since).
And so to some updates and questions I’ve been asked:
Last year all the palm trees were temporarily relocated. Apparently this is thanks to their root system; most other types of trees are difficult or impossible to move with any great success, and have been cleared from the corridor. Some trees on adjacent private land have been affected by this too.
The “up” (westernmost) track has been ripped up and works continue. Digging has started at some locations. They’ve had to investigate what is being dug up for contamination. In some cases asbestos has been located and safely removed — but don’t panic! Importantly, none of it was in the unsafe fibre form.
With only two tracks in service, all trains continue to stop at all stations. For passengers between Highett and the City, this has actually been better — effectively doubling the peak hour service frequency. For some of us, it’ll be sad to see it go.
Mckinnon and Ormond stations closed in March. Bentleigh will close in early June. All three will open at different stages during August once the major works are complete.
Buses are running between Caulfield and Moorabbin for passengers going to/from those stations.
Despite the PTV web site showing the buses as not stopping at Glenhuntly or Patterson, I’m told they are officially “stopping all stations” buses, so for instance a passenger from Glenhuntly to Mckinnon doesn’t have to double-back via Caulfield or Bentleigh… though the timetables (which also drive the Journey Planner and Google Maps) say they do.
There are other quirks with the buses. On weekends they run every 7 minutes during the day, despite the trains being every 10 minutes… this is okay given the combined frequency at the Caulfield end (where most passengers need to change) is 12 trains per hour. It’s a similar story after 10pm on weekdays.
And curiously on Friday and Saturday nights the all-night trains run every 60 minutes, but the replacement buses run every 30 minutes, probably to better connect at both Moorabbin and Caulfield. So if you are coming home late (after 1am) on the weekend and live on that part of the Frankston line, catch the first train to Caulfield, and if it’s a Dandenong train, change to the bus — you’ll save about half-an-hour (less any walking time from the bus stop) by not having to wait for the next Frankston service.
Apparently some of the equipment on the project is being used in Australia for the first time, including the “silent piler” used for some of the piling. It would seem the government’s commitment to fifty level crossing removals is already paying off — it’s worth the contractor bringing in the best gear in the world if they know more projects are coming, and it’s likely they’ll win some of them.
What’s happening during the big shut?
Before the big shut there are two more weekend shutdowns: 14-15 of May, and 4-5 June.
From the start of the June/July school holidays, the rail line will close for 37 days for major works, with no trains between Caulfield and Moorabbin for that time. Obviously the first part of that covers the holidays, but 3 weeks or so will be normal weekdays.
Expect lots of buses running up and down. For previous shuts, up to 100 have been in action during peak periods, and they were mostly during school and/or university holidays.
Apparently roughly a third of the buses will be stopping all stations, and two-thirds express, reflecting the overall travel patterns on the line. For the express buses they’ve been trying different routes to spread the load a bit, which has worked out well — though for the major works period there may be a lot of truck movements to deal with as well.
Digging out the trenches will take roughly the first third of the shutdown period. Apparently they’ll move about 240,000 cubic metres of earth, and each truck carries 14 cubic metres. By my calculations this means a staggering 17,142 truck movements in
12 10 days, or about 1400 1700 a day. Yikes! So expect to see a lot of trucks. Edit: It’ll be in the first 10 days, not twelve.
During major works, a viewing platform is likely to be set up at Ormond, and cameras were set up some time ago to film time-lapse video for later publication.
Part of Gunn Reserve in Glenhuntly has been set aside for dumping earth, but this will used for contingency purposes if they can’t move stuff off-site quickly enough.
Roughly the second third of the 37 days will be structural works.
The last third will be station works and so on. All being well, the line will re-open on Monday 1st August, with Mckinnon station also opening then, though Ormond and Bentleigh stations won’t re-open until late August.
Will pedestrian crossings at Centre Rd & McKinnon Rd be right outside the station plazas, and be programmed for minimum pedestrian wait time?
The plans I’ve seen show crossings directly adjacent the station entrances at all three stations.
I’m told by Vicroads that they will be designed to prioritise pedestrians, while still keeping road traffic moving. (Under their Smartroads strategy, Centre Road is a “pedestrian priority” and “bus priority route”. Mckinnon Road is considered a minor road. North Road overall is a “preferred traffic route” and “bus priority route”, but the shopping centre is marked for “pedestrian priority”.)
How well this works in practice remains to be seen — I’d imagine this will be easier at Centre and Mckinnon Roads, given they are narrow and not priority traffic routes. The balance may be more in favour of cars at North Road, which given the plans for Ormond station to have entrances on both sides of the road, is not a huge problem, at least for most station users.
Will McKinnon and Bentleigh stations be accessible from north approaches, and if so, will there also be pedestrian bridges at the northern ends?
It seems not. As with now, access will only be via the main roads.
Have any locals given feedback that they’re getting cold feet about the rail-under design, now that works are under way?
There is certainly a lot of angst from traders about the closures and their effect on passing trade and revenue, particularly during the periods involving road closures.
To an extent there has been a backlash to these complaints — from what I’ve seen, cafes do okay under these conditions, including from the construction workforce. But I suspect some traders such as The Paint Spot in Bentleigh, which inherently rely on nearby parking and have lost most of it temporarily (and all of it for some periods), are badly affected.
Local Leader newspaper: Backlash to the backlash over #Bentleigh level crossing works. pic.twitter.com/WEVJxwQQXI
— Daniel Bowen (@danielbowen) April 15, 2016
If Bentleigh had got skyrail, the closures and disruption and noise would have been far less.
(Dandenong skyrail early works started this weekend just gone, causing some complaints from residents.)
Everyone wants to know the differences in cost and noise between trench and viaduct methods. Are there any reliable, public, referenceable figures?
I don’t think so. Obviously skyrail/viaduct requires fewer underground services to be moved. In the case of Bentleigh (near Centre Road) and Mckinnon (Murray Road), two sets of major water pipes are being moved. For Bentleigh, they actually got in a tunnel boring machine for this purpose — I got the impression that these were only normally used on major tunnelling jobs.
Along much of the corridor they’re having to move the water table down by several metres, to help ensure water won’t flow into the trench in the future. To my untrained ear this sounds like messing with nature, but apparently from an engineering point of view, it’s straightforward if carefully designed. It just costs a bunch of money to do it.
One view I’ve heard about the Dandenong proposal is that a bunch of money is saved not moving services, and with reduced closures and savings from bus replacements — these funds are then put into better station and urban design, for instance escalators at all the stations, and all-over covering (though in the concept designs this does not include the entirety of the platforms). I haven’t seen any publicly available figures for just how much money we’re talking about.
Got more questions?
Ask them in the comments and I’ll try and get them answered in the coming days.
(However if it’s something critical, such as concerning local resident impacts, you should talk to the Level Crossing Removal Authority.)
Some questions from the comments…
yog: Do you have any idea of a detailed timeline for the Grange Road level crossing removal, as well as the others on the Dandenong line?
I don’t have anything detailed, other than you can expect them to push ahead with it pretty fast. One of the reasons they brought the Bentleigh area crossings forward by six months was to avoid having closures on both lines at once.
You can also expect them to be done and dusted by mid-2018, because this government is being very smart about project staging, and they know it would be electorally risky to not have it finished before the 2018 election period.
Me again: Are there any more indications of station design beyond the one image per station on the LXRA website?
I haven’t seen very much out there publicly, which is a shame, as there are some very detailed designs being used by the project teams. I’ll see if I can coax them into publishing more detail.
There were some not-very-detailed plans published in May 2015 for Mckinnon and Bentleigh only. These may have changed.
Steve: Do you know if the Glenhuntly tram square ‘upgrade’ that was supposed to have been done last year as part of the Bayside rail project will be done during the long shutdown?
I haven’t heard, but I wouldn’t be surprised if they do it at the same time. They’re getting smarter about piggybacking works… but I’m told this won’t be included during the shutdown.
Me again: What are the weekend shutdowns for? (Presumably rail-only)
As I understand it there’ll be no more road closures as part of this project. I’d assume the weekend shutdowns would be relatively minor works that have to be done in the rail corridor in preparation for the major works period.
DD: I wonder how many minutes per hour in the peak North Rd traffic can expect to be stopped for pedestrians in future? And whether the crossing lights at the station will be coordinated with those at the pedestrian crossing a few hundred metres to the east?
Hopefully they’ll be coordinated with the four (I think?) existing crossings between Booran/Wheatley and Grange/Jasper Roads. In any case, for traffic, the delays will be far fewer and shorter than the somewhat unpredictable boom gate down time experienced now. (I don’t know if an emergency vehicle has ever had to wait as a train driver struggled with a difficult ramp to unload a wheelchair passenger, but given the proximity to the Ormond fire station, I’d be surprised if it hasn’t happened.)
Thanks for the comments, keep them coming.
11/5/2016 – Some more Q+A
Gene: Any word from the LXRA about leaving trench space for a 4th track from Caufield to Moorabbin to later account for a sprawling Bayside corridor plus upgrades and electrification from Frankston to Baxter according to Laborís Anthony Albanese?
Electrification to Baxter is a good idea, because it would help serve the Peninsula (Leawarra) campus of Monash Uni, and it provides a chance to move the Frankston stabling yards out to Baxter, freeing up land for urban renewal.
Baxter is also a better location for a Peninsula Park And Ride.
I don’t know if it would necessarily result in a huge increase in passenger numbers, making four track express running necessary on the inner part of the line, but the LXRA has consistently said the project has passive provision for the fourth track (which basically means not doing much to provide it, other than not putting anything huge in its way). My assumption is it would result in demolition of platform 3 between Glenhuntly and Patterson, so the fact that the rebuilt stations are getting a third platform certainly indicates the fourth track won’t be happening any time soon.
Warwick: Why does a station need to be staffed to have gates? Is it for wheelchairs and the like?
Yes. One of the options I hope they’re exploring for Bentleigh (and in future for Ormond) is having the wide gate adjacent the booking office, so it can be monitored and opened by staff from within the office. This is commonly used around the world to minimise additional staff requirements, while still ensuring gates are kept closed.
They have used this design at modified setups at Parliament (northern end) and Flagstaff, though I don’t know if they make use of it yet.
(I’ll take your other points as comments!)
Michael (off-blog): Will any noise abatement treatments be applied to surfaces of the cuttings?
Based on what the project team has told me, apparently not.
D (off-blog) wanted to know what would be provided: Lifts, escalators, ramps, stairs?
Stairs and lifts for each platform, with an additional set at Ormond for the entrance on the south side of North Road.
Correction: Bentleigh and Mckinnon will have stairs and lifts. Ormond will have stairs and two lifts for each platform (eg one on each side of North Road), but no ramps.
It sounds like they’ve learnt lessons from Laverton and Epping, where stairs and lifts were provided, but at the former the lifts aren’t big enough to fit ambulance stretchers, and at both they have semi-regular problems due to power failures. These will have additional failsafes such as battery backup.
At Springvale and Mitcham, ramps were also provided, but these are problematic — for DDA compliance, the gradient has to be very slight, with regular flat rest areas, meaning they take a lot of space, and barely anybody uses them.
18/6/2016 – Liam via Twitter: any likelihood of better traffic management for the busses when the big shutdown happens? Caulfield to Ormond in the PM is atrocious
Yes, the northern section is problematic both in the AM peak and PM peak. Buses get stuck for long periods at some of the traffic lights, and in traffic around Glen Huntly, and of course (ironically) at the Neerim Road level crossing.
Metro is offering free parking at Caulfield Racecourse. It’s unclear how many people are using this, but obviously the more people do, the worse this will be for the buses along Queens Parade.
During the big shut, the express buses are likely to run via Bambra Road/Thomas Street. The stopping buses obviously won’t be subject to the Neerim Road crossing during this time, but other delays will be a problem.
Vicroads has been asked several times about allocating bus-only lanes. They’ve declined – of course unlike Ballarat Road, which used them, all the roads used for the bustitution routes here (apart from South Road) are max two lanes each way. All the same, it would make sense to look at specific bottlenecks and ensure buses (which may be carrying 70 or more people each) aren’t delayed.
I think they should also deploy some traffic control on Station Street at Caulfield, to ensure the buses turning right to loop back to the station waiting area aren’t held up as at present.
What Vicroads has said is that they’ll be monitoring traffic flow, and tweaking traffic light sequences. This seems to already be the case at North Road/Grange Road, where the southbound cycle is normally very short (if no pedestrians are crossing). Hopefully they’ve also looked closely at the right turns at Neerim/Grange Roads and Jasper/South Roads.
Keep the questions coming. There’s also an official Community Information Sessions: Monday 16th May 2016 from 2pm to 8pm (drop in at any time) at the Bentleigh Club, 33 Yawla Street, and every Wednesday (same location, 5pm-8pm) during the big shut from 25th June to 31st July.
12 replies on “Bentleigh/Mckinnon/Ormond level crossings: update and Q+A”
Great post Daniel! Do you have any idea of a detailed timeline for the Grange Road level crossing removal, as well as the others on the Dandenong line?
Thanks for the info Daniel.
Do you know if the Glenhuntly tram square ‘upgrade’ that was supposed to have been done last year as part of the Bayside rail project will be done during the long shutdown? Seems like an opportune time.
Great post, thanks Daniel.
Are there any more indications of station design beyond the one image per station on the LXRA website? Also, what are the weekend shutdowns for? (Presumably rail-only)
The complaints in Carnegie are sounding more and more like sour grapes and people who just want to ring money out of the government. Home owners were never going to get that much money from houses right next to the rail line and most of the suburb is now being converted to medium density housing.
Really useful information Daniel, as I live in this area. Regarding the pedestrian crossing planned for North Rd, it would be a shame to spend $150m and still see substantial traffic downtime due to pedestrians crossing the road. I wonder how many minutes per hour in the peak North Rd traffic can expect to be stopped for pedestrians in future? And whether the crossing lights at the station will be coordinated with those at the pedestrian crossing a few hundred metres to the east?
On the topic of local traders and the effect on their businesses, I went into the pet supplies store on North Rd on a Saturday during the road closure a few weeks back and I was the only person there. Normally it is bustling with shoppers on the weekend. So the effect on traders is genuine, if relatively short-lived. Obviously not with the cafe mentioned in your post though.
I hope you cover the skyrail works in as much detail as you have the Frankston line works – it is really interesting for me as a local in both cases.
@DD, the advantage of multiple station entrances (each side of North Rd) should alleviate demand on the pedestrian crossing.
Half of the pedestrian catchment otherwise always has to cross the road to reach the station entrance, with the consequent wait time for peds, and for cars)
It’s why it seems crazy not to provide entrances on each side of any major road a station sits under (or over) when rebuilt.
Thanks for another great post Daniel, I really hope you do the same kind of analysis for the CD9 project as it’s been consistently much more reliable and informative than anything I read elsewhere, if only our media outlets were as diligent!
Sorry @Tim I have to disagree, I lived at the back of South Yarra station for years where signalling and maintenance night works were a pretty regular occurrence but some of the works over the past weekend were on a different level (eg woodchipping machinery for the trimmed trees, loud diesel motors idling for hours etc), I guess because of PTV/Metro & the LXRA both being there concurrently and without a break from 1.30am Sat morning to 10.30pm Sun night. Having said that though, in my area of Carnegie we were informed by mail drop over a week beforehand and I also received a call from my case manager on the Friday before so I was well aware of what was coming and would have thought others were too.
In South Yarra we were rarely advised by Metro/PTV in advance about night works and often the first we’d know of it was from the dulcet tones of heavy machinery at 1am! It’s all part and parcel of living near the line though so personally I was prepared for the works last weekend, maybe it just hasn’t happened in this section for a long time and taking place before the ink was even dry on the contract was just one more kick to residents already sensitive to the changes happening unusually quickly for a major infrastructure project, especially one with such a big impact.
Incidentally I can’t speak for others but I share a boundary with the line and I’m still in the initial stages of eligibility assessment for the voluntary purchase scheme and have been advised it will be a few more weeks before I hear anything more. It’s a fairly detailed process and I certainly wouldn’t expect that complaints about weekend work will make any difference to the eventual outcome.
Thanks all. I’ve tried to answer some questions in the post.
I’m certainly going to do my best to keep track of the CD9 project, bearing in mind that I don’t live on that line, so I won’t be seeing it every day!
1: Why does a station need to be staffed to have gates? Is it for wheelchairs and the like? When I lived in Singapore I don’t recall gates having a person babysitting for this purpose.
Even if they do need staff, would this not be a more sensible deployment of inspectors? If a person jumps a gate to board a train then they have a slam dunk for prosecution.
2: Those diagrams show the majority of the platform length being on the side of the street with no entrance. It seems absurd not to put even a simple staircase there.
3: Why have they retained the current platform layout rather than moving to a dual-island design? Dual island would provide much greater ease of use: one platform for city, one for Frankston.
Credit to you (Daniel) for your informative and diligent updates about Victoria’s public transport projects unlike some media outlets I’ve read. Keep it up!
Any word from the LXRA about leaving trench space for a 4th track from Caufield to Moorabbin to later account for a sprawling Bayside corridor plus upgrades and electrification from Frankston to Baxter according to Labor’s Anthony Albanese?
Did anyone get a chance to go to the information session? I’m sure there was much more info there than they’ve released online!
[…] See more details of the construction works in my last post […]